State taxation authority faces limits beyond constitutional requirements. While the Commerce Clause, Due Process, and Equal Protection establish baseline protections enforced through courts, federal statutes create additional constraints that Congress has enacted to protect interstate commerce.
These federal laws operate differently from constitutional principles — they provide absolute prohibitions applicable uniformly across all states rather than case-by-case judicial interpretations.
Article I, Section 8 grants Congress power to "regulate Commerce...among the several States." This constitutional authority enables Congress to enact statutes that restrict state taxation of interstate commerce beyond what courts would require under the dormant Commerce Clause doctrine.
Federal legislation preempts conflicting state laws through the Supremacy Clause, making congressional action more definitive than case-by-case constitutional litigation, which requires businesses to challenge state taxes individually.
Federal statutes provide clear-cut rules rather than evolving constitutional standards that require litigation to establish. Businesses are aware of what federal law protects, while constitutional nexus requirements evolve through Supreme Court decisions, such as the one in South Dakota v. Wayfair, which can overturn decades of precedent.
For example, Public Law 86-272 creates an absolute prohibition on certain state income taxation; constitutional nexus standards would leave the same activities in legal gray areas, requiring expensive litigation to resolve.
Congress can restrict state taxation that would satisfy all constitutional requirements. States might have substantial nexus under the Commerce Clause, minimum contacts under Due Process, and non-discriminatory taxes under Equal Protection — but federal statute still prohibits taxation. This additional layer of protection operates independently of constitutional analysis, providing businesses with federal rights that exceed constitutional minimums.
Public Law 86-272 prohibits states from imposing net income taxes when business activities in the state are limited to three specific conditions that must all be satisfied simultaneously:
1. Solicitation of orders for sales of tangible personal property: Business activities must be limited to requesting purchases from potential customers. Solicitation includes activities directly related to requesting orders, such as providing product information, answering questions, and distributing samples or promotional materials. Activities beyond requesting orders lose protection.
2. Orders sent outside the state for approval or rejection: The out-of-state business must retain authority to accept or reject orders. Even if acceptance is routine or automatic, orders must be approved at locations outside the taxing state. In-state order approval eliminates federal protection.
3. Orders filled by shipment or delivery from outside the state: Products must be shipped or delivered from locations outside the taxing state. Maintaining inventory within the state for order fulfillment destroys protection, even if the inventory is held by independent third parties.
Meeting these requirements creates absolute federal protection regardless of whether a constitutional nexus exists. States cannot impose net income taxes on protected activities, even when businesses exceed economic nexus thresholds or maintain substantial connections that satisfy Due Process' minimum contacts.
Public Law 86-272's narrow scope excludes most contemporary business models, limiting its practical value for modern interstate commerce.
The Multistate Tax Commission's Statement of Information Concerning Practices Under Public Law 86-272 attempts to clarify which activities remain protected versus which exceed solicitation. While not binding federal law or regulation, MTC guidance influences state interpretations and administrative practices. States participating in the Multistate Tax Compact generally follow MTC guidance when determining whether to assert income taxation.
Recent MTC revisions address internet-era activities, creating standards for when website features exceed protected solicitation. Allowing online orders through websites generally remains a protected solicitation. However, providing customer account management, processing returns or exchanges online, or offering technical support through websites may exceed solicitation depending on specific functionalities and business operations.
Congress enacted the Internet Tax Freedom Act in 1998 to prevent state and local taxation from burdening the developing internet economy. Original protections temporarily prohibited states from imposing discriminatory taxes on electronic commerce — taxes applying to electronic transactions but not equivalent non-electronic transactions. ITFA also banned taxes on internet access services, preventing states from taxing broadband, dial-up, DSL, and other connectivity services.
The statute created a temporary moratorium rather than permanent protection. Congress extended ITFA multiple times with modifications through 2016, each extension requiring new legislation as the moratorium approached expiration. Extensions reflected ongoing political debates about state revenue needs versus protecting internet commerce from taxation.
Congress made internet access tax prohibition permanent in 2016 through the Trade Facilitation and Trade Enforcement Act. Permanent protection now covers broadband, DSL, fiber optic, satellite internet, and other connectivity services, preventing states from taxing the service of accessing the internet itself. This federal constraint operates indefinitely without requiring congressional renewal.
However, broader electronic commerce protections expired. E-commerce taxation — sales tax on products purchased online, income tax on businesses selling through websites, gross receipts taxes on digital transactions — now operates under constitutional standards without federal statutory protection. Wayfair economic nexus rules apply to online sales just as they apply to catalog or telephone sales, with no special federal protection for internet commerce.
The Railroad Revitalization and Regulatory Reform Act of 1976 (4-R Act) prohibits discriminatory state taxation of rail transportation property and operations. Federal law prevents states from:
These federal protections create specific rights enforceable through federal courts. Railroads regularly litigate under the 4-R Act, challenging state property assessments and discriminatory taxation.
Federal law restricts state and local taxation of aviation fuel used in interstate air commerce. While states retain authority to impose reasonable taxes on aviation fuel, federal statutes limit rates and prevent discriminatory taxation of airline fuel compared to other motor fuels.
These constraints protect interstate air travel from excessive state taxation that could burden commercial aviation.
Various federal statutes constrain state taxation of telecommunications services, particularly interstate phone calls, internet telephony (VoIP), and wireless services. The Federal Communications Act preempts certain state regulatory taxes on interstate telecommunications, although states retain authority over intrastate services and generally applicable business taxes that are not specifically targeting telecommunications.
Discern helps businesses manage compliance requirements across all 51 jurisdictions through comprehensive registered agent services, automated compliance tracking, and expert guidance on multi-state obligations.
Ready to manage multi-state nexus compliance? Book a demo with Discern today.
.png){kind=small}